Emergence of Time

\(IaM^e\)

2024

Abstract

Building on the ontological equivalence of informational configurations established in Paper I, we derive a model of the universe based on ordering of these configurations. We identify an emergent ordinal time within the static Wheeler–DeWitt multiverse. Observer-experienced reality is then dominated by histories that minimize description length providing a unified mechanism for the emergence of time, unitarity, quantum probabilities, and the suppression of divergences. Observers most likely find them from maximally compressed paths, as those are numerously dominant and hence most probable.

Download PDF Version

Ontological Framework

We consider the universe as a static informational object \(U\) consisting of \(n\) bits. All physically and observer-relevant structures are encoded within this data. Observers are particular configurations \(O \subset U\) whose internal structure allows them to encode a sense of temporal ordering.

Since \(U\) is atemporal, time cannot be fundamental. We define an observer’s experience of time as the ordering of configurations that preserves the internal correlations of \(O\). Let \[\mathcal{C}(O) = \{\pi : \pi \text{ is a permutation of configurations in } U \text{ consistent with } O \}\] denote the set of orderings compatible with the observer’s internal structure. Only permutations in \(\mathcal{C}(O)\) correspond to possible temporal experiences for \(O\).

In this sense, the universe is a timeless informational structure. Dynamics emerge from the correlations inherent in the static data, as experienced by observers through specific orderings of configurations. Arbitrary orderings that destroy these correlations are structurally incompatible with observer experience.

Emergence of Wave-Like Structure from Compressibility

Among all observer-consistent orderings \(\mathcal{C}(O)\), those that are highly compressible are combinatorially dominant. Let \(K(\pi)\) denote the Kolmogorov complexity of a permutation \(\pi\). Then \[\#\{\pi \in \mathcal{C}(O) \,|\, K(\pi) \text{ minimal}\} \gg \#\{\pi \in \mathcal{C}(O) \,|\, K(\pi) \text{ high}\}.\] This dominance is purely structural: it reflects the number of permutations consistent with observer continuity, not any stochastic selection or prior. Our Python simulations confirm that, across a wide range of ensembles, compressible permutations vastly outnumber incompressible ones.

The wavefunction arises as the minimal linear encoding that preserves correlations across these compressible orderings. Superposition naturally appears because linear combinations of compressible orderings remain compressible and maintain the correlations necessary for observer-consistent experience. Interference phenomena reflect the overlap between different orderings within this linear encoding.

The effective Born weights emerge from the combinatorial multiplicity of orderings corresponding to particular outcomes. Specifically, the squared amplitude of a component in the linear encoding reflects the relative number of permutations consistent with that outcome. Observers therefore experience quantum probabilities not as fundamental randomness, but as a direct consequence of the structural abundance of compressible, observer-consistent orderings.

Summary

Wheeler-DeWitt

We adopt the canonical formulation of quantum gravity, in which the universal state \(\Psi[h_{ij}(\mathbf{x}),\phi(\mathbf{x})]\) satisfies the Wheeler–DeWitt (WdW) equation \[\hat{H}\Psi = 0,\] and contains no fundamental time parameter (DeWitt 1967). We interpret \(\Psi\) in an Everettian sense as a static superposition over all admissible 3-geometries and matter field configurations: \[\ket{\Psi} = \sum_i c_i \ket{h_i,\phi_i}.\]

In this view, the universe is a timeless informational structure. Any notion of dynamics must arise from correlations internal to \(\Psi\), rather than from external temporal evolution.

Spectral Selection Principle

Among all relational histories consistent with the universal state \(\Psi\), observer-experienced permutation is dominated by histories whose total description length is minimal.

Let \(S\) denote a relational history induced by a particular factorization and ordering of configurations. The relative weight of \(S\) is \[P(S) \propto 2^{-K(S)},\] where \(K(S)\) is the Kolmogorov complexity (or minimal description length) of \(S\) (Kolmogorov 1965).

Emergence of Quantum Structure

Wavefunction as Optimal Encoding

We assume the wavefunction \(\psi\) emerges as the minimal encoding of reality with an observer.

Highly irregular configurations require longer descriptions and are suppressed, leading to an effective low-frequency, smooth structure.

Unitarity from Informational Stability

Persistence of observer identity requires that successive encodings preserve total information content. In a linear representation space, this restricts admissible transformations to norm-preserving maps. Continuous norm preservation uniquely selects unitary evolution, with a Hermitian generator \(\hat{H}\), yielding \[i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}\psi = \hat{H}\psi.\]

The Born Rule from Spectral Optimality

We now strengthen the derivation of the Born rule by identifying it as the unique decoding rule compatible with Spectral Selection Principle and observer persistence.

Problem Statement

Let \(\psi \in \mathcal{H}\) be the observer’s compressed encoding of relational correlations. A probability rule assigns to each outcome \(i\) a weight \[P(i) = f(|\psi_i|),\] where \(f\) is a non-negative function.

We seek the unique \(f\) compatible with the following physically motivated constraints.

Constraints

(C1) Additivity under coarse-graining

If outcomes \(i\) and \(j\) are grouped, \[P(i \cup j) = P(i) + P(j).\]

(C2) Composition consistency

For independent subsystems \(A\) and \(B\), \[P(i_A, j_B) = P(i_A) P(j_B).\]

(C3) Basis invariance

Probabilities must be invariant under unitary change of basis.

(C4) Reconstruction optimality

The decoding rule must minimize mean squared reconstruction error between encoded and decoded histories. This is the unique optimal decoder for finite observers using lossy compression.

Uniqueness of the Squared Norm

Constraints (C1) and (C2) imply that \(f(x)\) must be quadratic in amplitude magnitude: \[f(x) = k x^2.\]

Constraint (C3) excludes dependence on phase or basis-dependent quantities.

Constraint (C4) selects the \(L^2\) norm uniquely: among all \(L^p\) norms, only \(p = 2\) yields linear projections, orthogonality preservation, and stable error minimization under compression.

Normalization fixes \(k = 1\), yielding \[P(i) = |\psi_i|^2.\]

Conclusion.

The Born rule is not an independent axiom, but the unique probability assignment compatible with spectral compression, compositional consistency, and observer persistence in Hilbert space.

Physical Meaning of the Born Weight

Multiplicity explains why the squared norm (\(P = |\psi|^2\)) is the correct measure selected by the optimal decoding rule.

Lemma: Quadratic Scaling in Linear Encoding

In any linear wave-based encoding scheme, the number of distinguishable microstates \(\Omega\) consistent with a macroscopic wave constraint scales with the squared norm of the amplitude. Following Parseval’s Theorem, the total energy (or informational "power") of a signal in Hilbert space is: \[E = \int | \psi(x) |^2 dx\] In our framework, "Power" is equivalent to the **bandwidth of the execution trace**. A higher amplitude \(A\) provides a quadratically larger state-space volume for microstate permutations that remain consistent with the observer’s template. Thus, the multiplicity of observer-instances is \(M \propto |\psi|^2\).

The Universal Prior and Self-Locating Uncertainty

Applying a universal prior (Solomonoff) over the ensemble \(\Omega\), the probability \(P\) of an observer finding themselves in state \(S\) is defined by its Kolmogorov Complexity \(\mathcal{K}(S)\): \[P(S) \propto 2^{-\mathcal{K}(S) + c}\] where \(c\) is a constant determined by the choice of universal Turing machine. This represents self-locating uncertainty: the observer is not "choosing" a path, but is statistically distributed across all consistent bit-string permutations.

Derivation of the Born Weight

By combining the multiplicity of the linear wave-template with the universal prior, the relative measure of observer density across configuration space is: \[P(\text{Alice} \in \psi) = \frac{|\psi|^2}{\int |\psi|^2 dx}\] This normalization reflects the relative density of observer-instances, not a stochastic collapse of the wavefunction.

The Vanishing Measure of Divergences

This derivation provides a natural "soft cutoff" for the infinities of Quantum Field Theory. While divergent states exist mathematically, their description length \(\mathcal{K}\) explodes. Since: \[\lim_{\mathcal{K} \to \infty} 2^{-\mathcal{K}} = 0\] the measure of observers inhabiting divergent branches is zero. Physical laws appear smooth and renormalized because only finite, highly-compressible (low-\(\mathcal{K}\)) branches possess sufficient multiplicity resulting high probability of existence.

Singularities and Renormalization

Configurations corresponding to classical singularities in GR, or ultraviolet divergences in QFT possess vanishing or ill-defined informational structure. Such states require maximal description length and are exponentially suppressed under SSP. Their observational probability is zero.

Renormalization in quantum field theory arises as a direct consequence: high-frequency modes are incompressible and do not contribute to dominant observer-compatible histories. Effective field theories are therefore maximal-compressibility approximations to the static informational substrate.

Discussion

Spacetime geometry, time, quantum probabilities, and classicality emerge as features of typical correlations within a timeless universal state. Singularities and divergences mark the boundaries of informational accessibility, not physical breakdowns.

The Spectral Selection Principle shifts the explanatory burden from fundamental dynamics to informational selection, providing a unified resolution of the problem of time, the origin of quantum probabilities, and the absence of observable infinities.

Supplementary Materials

DeWitt, Bryce S. 1967. “Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory.” Physical Review 160 (5): 1113–48.
Kolmogorov, Andrey N. 1965. “Three Approaches to the Quantitative Definition of Information.” Problems of Information Transmission 1 (1): 1–7.