The strongest evidence for the programme comes from two recent exact results, which we summarise here. Both concern the same mathematical object: the off-diagonal density matrix B = ρ − diag(ρ) of a compressed configuration.
Paper VII [meskanen2026vii] encodes two-frame fermion configurations as complex wavefunctions ψ = f0 + if1 and computes the density matrix ρ = |ψ⟩⟨ψ|. The off-diagonal part B captures everything the codec records when a fermion moves between frames.
Four results are established analytically and verified numerically:
Born rule identity. For a fermion in superposition ψ(𝜃) = cos𝜃ei + isin𝜃ej,
| (2) |
where P = sin2𝜃 is the Born-rule hop probability. The boson amplitude is the interference term of the Born rule, expressed as a matrix norm.
These results follow from the single definition B = ρ− diag(ρ) and the normalisation of ψ. No interaction terms, coupling constants, or particle species were introduced.
Paper VIII [meskanen2026viii] applies the identical decomposition to metric configurations: a
two-frame metric pair (g(0),g(1)) is encoded as ψ(x) = g(0)(x) + ig(1)(x). The same ρdiag(ρ) + B split
then yields:
Graviton amplitude theorem. For orthogonal metric profiles at mixing angle 𝜖,
| (3) |
the exact gravitational analogue of equation (2). The formula is independent of metric profiles, system size, and overall scale.
Newtonian potential. Graviton flux conservation over spherical shells gives A(r) ∝ 1∕r exactly, and the overlap integral yields
| (4) |
The factor 8π = 2 × 4π arises from spherical geometry alone — the same factor that recovers Bekenstein–Hawking entropy in Paper IV [meskanen2026iv].
Equations (2) and (3) are identical in form. This is not a coincidence of presentation. Both follow from
the density matrix decomposition applied to a normalised superposition of two orthogonal
configurations. The formula sin(2α)∕ is the unique consequence of this structure, regardless
of whether α parametrises a fermion in quantum superposition or a metric in gravitational
superposition.
The conjecture is that this shared structure reflects a shared origin: quantum field theory and general relativity are two projections of the same compression principle onto different physical degrees of freedom.